Discussing JMC with… Michael Bugeja

Share

Michael BugejaMichael Bugeja, who directs the Greenlee School at Iowa State University, is author of Interpersonal Divide (Oxford University Press, 2005), which won the Clifford Christians Award for research in media ethics, and Living Ethics across media platforms (Oxford, 2008), which calls for a moral convergence to accompany the technological one.

Bugeja’s research has been cited in The New York Times, USA Today, the Washington Post, the Christian Science Monitor, The Futurist, The International Herald Tribune (France), Toronto Globe & Mail (Canada), The Guardian (UK) and The Economist, among others. His articles have appeared in Journalism Quarterly, Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, New Media and Society, and Journal of Mass Media Ethics, among others.

Bugeja also writes professionally for such publications as The Quill, Editor & Publisher and The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Bugeja became director of the Greenlee School in 2003. Previously he was a journalism professor at Ohio University and a media adviser at Oklahoma State University. In the 1970s, he worked as state editor for United Press International and holds a Ph.D. from OSU and a master’s from South Dakota State University.

How do you define mass communication?

This is an excellent question because we cannot yet answer it sufficiently enough to create a business model for major news outlets struggling with Internet and converged platforms. In the past, the power of the technology–whether it was a 64-inch six-color sheet-fed press or a 50,000 watt radio station–was aligned proportionately with the target market mass audience. The rule was, the larger the investment, the greater the audience or the potential for the mass. Now, a high school blogger has the means to broadcast, telecast or publish worldwide through the laptop in her bedroom; so technology and investment no longer are reliable gauges of mass audience.

To be sure, the technology of old media was its chief expense, as in the purchase and storage of paper and ink, or the cost and maintenance of a printing press, or the equipping of a broadcast tower and studio (not to mention a fleet of delivery trucks or television vans and the upkeep and insurance on them). The sheer cost of such technology kept the news in aristocratic hands. The democratization of media, which continues to this day globally, has taken news out of those hands and placed it in the populace’s, giving the audience a google of outlets associated with lifestyle choices or psychographics.

The disconnect between the power of the technology and the size of the audience has generated this question–how do we define a mass, by its potential for or actual audience?–data that can fluctuate wildly from day to day, yet again undermining business models based on reader or viewer audits by which to establish advertising rates. [Read more...]

Discussing JMC with… Candace Bowen

Share

Candace BowenCandace Perkins Bowen directs both the Center for Scholastic Journalism at Kent State University and the statewide Ohio Scholastic Media Association.

She teaches media writing plus journalism teaching methods and desktop publishing for Integrated Language Arts majors.

A former high school journalism teacher with a BS in newspaper journalism and an MA in journalism education, Perkins Bowen is a past president and remains on the board of the Journalism Education Association. In addition, she heads the Steering Committee of the Student Press Law Center Advisory Council and is the current head of the Scholastic Journalism Division of AEJMC.

How do you keep your students excited about working in the field of communications in light of shrinking job opportunities?

Are job opportunities really shrinking? Or are they shifting and rearranging? Our democracy still needs an informed citizenry, and thorough, fair, honest and accurate information must be available. Journalists need to be flexible and creative in their approach to providing that. In today’s world, that also means being digital and thinking about audiences and trying new techniques. Doing THAT makes it easy to keep students excited — they can use Flash and Soundslides and all sorts of bells and whistles. The not-so-exciting part is when you must remind them of spelling and grammar and AP style and ethical considerations. [Read more...]

Discussing JMC with… Jimmy Ivory

Share

Jimmy IvoryJames D. (Jimmy) Ivory is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (a.k.a. Virginia Tech), where he has worked since 2005. His teaching and research at Virginia Tech is primarily focused on media effects and communication technologies. Ivory recently founded the Virginia Tech Gaming and Media Effects Research Laboratory (VT G.A.M.E.R. Lab) a small research facility where students and faculty investigate the content and physiological, psychological, and social effects of video games, virtual worlds, and other media technologies. For 2008-2009, Ivory serves as the head of the Communication Technology (CTEC) Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC).

Before joining Virginia Tech, Ivory earned a Ph.D. in Mass Communication from the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, as well as an M.A. in Communication and B.S. in Journalism from the Department of Communication and Journalism at the University of Wyoming. Ivory lives in Blacksburg, Virginia, with his wife Adrienne.

How do you define mass communication?

I suppose I am not particularly concerned about any distinction between “mass communication” and any other categories of the communication pantheon (interpersonal, group, public, etc.), primarily because research seems to find time and time again that a lot of communication processes and effects occur in surprisingly similary ways across “levels” of communication. Whether we are talking one-on-one, watching television, reading a book, etc., there are consistent trends in our responses to messages and their sources. I think there are distinctions between the levels of communication, and they matter, but I guess they don’t bother me a lot given that there are often as many similarities in communication phenomena across levels as there are differences.

That said, I don’t buy into the idea that mass communication is dying or dead. Talk of social networking and user-generated content and things might prompt some to write an obituary for mass communication, but at the end of the day a lot of these formats still result in one person or corporation raking in cash generated via a lot of individuals’ media use in one way or another. Hmm. Maybe that’s a good definition of mass communication right there. [Read more...]

Discussing JMC with… Serena Carpenter

Share

Serena CarpenterSerena Carpenter joined the Arizona State University faculty in 2007 specializing in newer media after finishing her Ph.D. degree in Media & Information Studies at Michigan State University. Her research has been published in research journals such as Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Mass Communication and Society, and Telecommunications Policy.

Carpenter teaches courses in the areas of online and broadcast journalism in the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication. Carpenter has also taught courses at Michigan State University and Bloomsburg University. Her professional background includes working as a television reporter. Carpenter has produced an award-winning documentary on rural issues. She also works with journalists and faculty helping them transition to the online environment.

Her teaching and research interest areas include newer media, news quality, and sociology of news production. Carpenter is an active member of the Association of Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, International Communication Association, Broadcast Education Association and National Communication Association.

How do you define mass communication?

This definition is not my own, but I am not sure who defined it. Mass communication is organized communication to anonymous audiences. The communicator operates within an organizational setting.

However, we have to go beyond the mass-marketing mindset. Educators not only have to reevaluate skills courses that they are teaching, but they have to also concentrate on discussing how communication is changing among individuals, and how the news industry fits into people’s lives. In the past, the mass media were directed toward a large, heterogeneous audience whereas today’s consumer market is more fragmented and complex than the mass market, which translates into news media having less impact in a concentrated way. Organizations need to understand readers and how to connect to readers offline and online. Power has tilted in the direction of the people. The use of social media is one approach to connecting to readers and opinion leaders.

This also means teaching journalists to not only understand how to produce online content under the organization’s umbrella, but also to educate students on the economic, entrepreneurial, and relational aspects of the business and the implications of their actions. Scott Rosenberg, formerly of Salon.com, said that being part of a monopoly let journalists be ignorant about every aspect of the business besides the content. Today, journalists need to understand the broader components of the business to survive. This includes understanding their readers to a greater extent. This is why I also believe that mass communication theory courses should contain interpersonal communication theory as well. [Read more...]

Discussing JMC with… Dane Claussen

Share

Dane ClaussenDane S. Claussen is a Professor & Director of Graduate Programs at the Department of Journalism and Mass Communication at Point Park University, Pittsburgh, Pa. He teaches Communication Law and Regulation; Applied Mass Communication Research Methods; Media Ethics and Professional Culture; Mass Communication History; Newspaper and Magazine Management; and Writing the Nonfiction Book. Dr. Claussen also regularly chairs master’s thesis committees and supervises many Directed Readings, Directed Research and Publication Project studies. (From August 2005 to May 2006, he also was Point Park’s first campus-wide Faculty Development Coordinator.) Since July 1987, Dr. Claussen has been President/Principal of American Newspaper Consultants, Ltd., a management consulting, expert witness, research, writing, editing, and publishing firm.

Dr. Claussen is Editor of the quarterly Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, one of the two major scholarly journals published by the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.

How do you define mass communication?

Some say “mass communication” is a dead term or a dead concept, but I disagree. The question is not whether there still is mass communication, because a lot of communication is still aimed at audiences larger than a few to a few dozen friends, neighbors, co-workers, and/or relatives, but how many is “mass”? And even this is not a new concept. When Robert Rhett’s famous Charleston newspaper had a circulation of only 550, was that really a “mass medium”? We treat it as such. So why isn’t a listserv with only, say, 550 names, or a blog with only 550 regular visitors, also a “mass” medium? It is. And we still have interpersonal media: cellphones, emails, IMs, Skype, etc. As for asynchronous media, such as TV on demand or Web sites, if the intended cumulative audience is intended to be more than only a limited number of persons as above, then it also is still a “mass” medium. I never thought that the term “mass communication” required simultaneous dissemination and/or simultaneous consumption, or that “mass” necessarily meant only numbers in the tens of thousands to hundreds of millions. [Read more...]

Discussing JMC with… Joseph Russomanno

Share

Joseph RussomannoJoseph Russomanno joined the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication in 1994. A native of Colorado, he earned a master’s degree in journalism from the University of Missouri School of Journalism. His decade-long career in broadcast news included two stops in St. Louis and two in Denver. He has worked as a news reporter in radio and television, and as a television news writer, newscast producer, and executive producer. His on-site assignments included the coverage of the 1987 Reagan-Gorbachev summit in Washington, D.C., Super Bowl XXI in Pasadena, and Super Bowl XXII in San Diego. He received several awards for his work as a broadcast journalist. After his career in journalism, Russomanno earned a doctorate from the University of Colorado-Boulder. His work there emphasized First Amendment theory and mass media law.

How do you define mass communication?

Textbook definition: A message from a source intended for multiple receivers – an audience of many. [Read more...]

Discussing JMC with… Jane Marcellus

Share

Jane MarcellusAssociate professor Dr. Jane Marcellus is an Associate Professor who teaches media history, feature writing and cultural studies at Middle Tennessee State University. Her research focuses on media history and gender, with a particular interest in representation of employed women in the 1920s and 1930s. Her work has been published in Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, American Journalism, Women’s Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Journal of Popular Culture, and Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. She holds a Ph.D. from the University of Oregon, master’s degrees from the University of Arizona and Northwestern, and a bachelor’s from Wesleyan University in Connecticut. She is a former journalist.

How do you define mass communication?

I would say mass communication or media communication refers to the institutions and practices through which public discourse is mediated, using a variety of technologies and imbricated in political, economic, and cultural concerns. [Read more...]

Discussing JMC with… Jan Slater

Share

Jan SlaterJan Slater is the Head of Advertising at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to her appointment at Illinois, Slater was an associate professor and the associate director of the E. W. Scripps School of Journalism at Ohio University for nine years. Slater joined the academy following a long career as an advertising practitioner, working in private industry, as well as advertising agencies in Omaha, Nebraska. When she left the business, she was running a successful advertising agency, J. Slater & Associates. Slater has been an active member of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication since 1995.

How do you define mass communication?

Mass Comm has traditionally referenced a means to conveying information to a population. I think many, in general, apply the mass media to the term. In the past — that has meant newspapers, magazines, and broadcast channels. My personal take on this is that communication has never been mass in its message — in that all messages have been tailored to a specific audience – and while we may have used mass media channels to deliver this – our message has been carefully crafted and targeted to a specific group.

Today, of course – mass media is shrinking in size and strength and consumption. That doesn’t change the context of our message – it simply changes the delivery. [Read more...]

Discussing JMC with… Erik Collins

Share

Dr. Erik CollinsDr. Erik Collins is the Associate Director for Graduate Studies and Research at the University of South Carolina in Columbia. A native of New York, Collins previously served as a senior public relations manager for major corporations including Miller Brewing Company and Philip Morris and taught at Syracuse and Ohio State universities.

How do you define mass communication?

One might, I suppose, define the term by focusing on technology. Let me define it in terms of my idea of its function. Mass Communication is the purposeful intent to communicate information that aids the functioning of individuals in a capitalistic, democratic society through multiple communication channels. [Read more...]

The Empathic Professor

Share

Inside Higher Ed | Biological theorist Richard Dawkins writes in The Selfish Gene that if we wish “to build a society in which people cooperate generously and unselfishly towards a common good, [we] can expect little help from biological nature … because we are born selfish.” Observers of academic scandal and fraudulent scholarship often attest to that. Conversely, economist Jeremy Rifkin believes “human beings are not inherently evil or intrinsically self-centered and materialistic, but are of a very different nature — an empathic one — and that all of the other drives that we have considered to be primary — aggression, violence, selfish behavior, acquisitiveness — are in fact secondary drives that flow from repression or denial of our most basic instinct.”

Who is right, at least when it comes to professors? [Read more...]