Book Review – The New York Times Reader: Science and Technology

Share


The New York Times Reader: Science and Technology. S. Holly Stocking and the Writers of The New York Times. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2011. 258 pp.

As a veteran of home ownership and the frequent repair of vehicles, buildings, toys, and appliances, I have a sizable collection of tools in my garage. I have organized those tools, some of which I know how to use, into separate toolboxes according to the job they would be used for. There are boxes for plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and general, so when the inevitable household disaster strikes, the appropriate box can be quickly located and delivered to the scene. Knowledge of which tools to keep in each box, as well as how to use them, came from a wide variety of experiences with my father, my father-in-law (who knows everything—just ask him), and my own trials and frequent failures.  [Read more...]

Book Review – The New York Times Reader: Science & Technology

Share

The New York Times Reader: Science & Technology. Holly Stocking, ed. (2011). Washington, DC: CQ Press/Sage.  pp. 258.

Many newspaper-writing anthologies read like yesterday’s news—a dated pile of clippings with little attention paid to whether the subject matter has much enduring appeal or value. The New York Times Reader series generally avoids this pitfall by selecting subjects that retain their appeal, and presenting them in some of the best journalistic English anywhere. The range of subject matter is impressive, and a reminder of just how often today’s news has a basis in natural sciences, from the effects of cell phones on the brain, to shrinking ice caps and disappearing bats, the prospective nature of life on planets yet to be discovered, and the nature of societies among animals.

[Read more...]

Book Review – Science for All: The Popularization of Science in Early Twentieth-Century Britain

Share

Science for All: The Popularization of Science in Early Twentieth-Century Britain. Peter J. Bowler. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009. 339 pp.

The central question raised by Science for All concerns the assumed decline of working scientists writing for the popular press after the Victorian Age in Britain. Observers of the history of science have noted that once scientists became professionalized around the turn of the twentieth century, they lost interest in writing for popular consumption and the field was taken over by journalists. Through extensive research and a good deal of meticulous detective work, Peter Bowler, a professor of the history of science at Queen’s University, Belfast, has collected a substantial body of evidence and builds a strong case that writing for the popular audience by working scientists was alive and well during the first four decades of the twentieth century.

[Read more...]