Book Review – Television Truths: Forms of Knowledge in Popular Culture

Share

Television Truths: Forms of Knowledge in Popular Culture. John Hartley. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. 290 pp.

John Hartley’s name has been on the short list of influential television studies scholars for over thirty years. He has held numerous academic posts and is now distinguished professor, Australian Research Council Federation Fellow, and research director of the Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation at Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia. He has earned the right to use a similarly authoritative and profound primary title for his most recent book.

What is “truth” with regard to a medium? In Television Truths, Hartley addresses the TV via lenses of epistemology, ethics/politics, aesthetics, and metaphysics. He does so by dividing the book into four parts, each headed by a question: Is TV true? Is TV a polity? Is TV beautiful? What can TV be? While perhaps not entirely or definitively answered, they are the types of questions that cut to the very core of television’s being. Hartley covers both the breadth and depth in an eminently portable book.

[Read more...]

Book Review[s]: Changing Face of Journalism, New New Media, Mass Media Scholarship

Share

The Changing Faces of Journalism: Tabloidization, Technology and Truthiness. Zelizer, Barbie (ed.) (2009). New York: Routledge. pp. 174.

New New Media. Levinson, Paul (2009). Boston: Allyn & Bacon Penguin Academics. pp. 226.

Arguing for a General Framework for Mass Media Scholarship. Potter, W. James (2009). Los Angeles: SAGE. pp. 394.

An impressive group of scholars weighs in on changing journalistic norms, and Barbie Zelizer does so understanding the challenge: “The very presence of change in academic inquiry has long been seen as a necessary but often risky aspect of the landscape of knowledge acquisition” (p. 1). Drawing upon sociology of knowledge, Zelizer sees “slow and gradual incorporation of change into academic thought” (p. 2). To the extent that we are in the business of creating new knowledge, change threatens to undo our treasured life’s work. Thus, Zelizer sees that “degrees of dissonance exist because journalism scholars have not sufficiently navigated pathways between journalism we imagine and journalism we have” (p. 3). The reminder is that journalistic realities may be diverse, even if we have greater consensus on ideals. The organizational structure of The Changing Faces of Journalism: Tabloidization, Technology and Truthiness divides essays along the three dimensions of tabloidization, technology, and truthiness—all popular concepts with limited theoretical development. [Read more...]